In January I had a very interesting email correspondence with Ruby, one of War Resisters’ International’s volunteer translators. One of the great things about someone who isn’t part of the WRI network helping us with translation is that they are (perforce) reading things that we are publishing, and will hopefully engage with our work (and perhaps even become a supporter of it) as a result.
Unlike my other placement organisation, ForcesWatch, which is critical of some military recruitment practices and wary of the military’s growing influence in society without being expressly anti-military/anti-militarist, WRI is a pacifist network opposed to all militaries, and all wars. So I end up using the word ‘anti’ a lot on my WRI days.
Ruby sent me the text she had translated (by Red Antimilitarista y Noviolenta de Andalucía – Antimilitarist and Nonviolent Network of Andalucía), and added this: ‘One thought I had whilst translating this is that I wondered whether the groups involved in RANA/WRI are aware of the following concept: if you are ‘against’ something eg war or poverty, then the conscious and the universe don’t see the whole part, but, in this case, only the war or poverty. It is more effective to work with positive statements eg peace/abundance for all.’
I replied ‘Thanks very much for the translation. You’re right. I rarely think – let alone remember – to frame things in that much more positive way. Peace work often feels like a massive and constant struggle – I guess we tend to end up using language that reflects that, such as anti-militarist.’
Ruby responded: ‘It is tricky when we are trying to turn something through 180 degrees. We have to understand the opposite of what we want in order to be in a place to bring it to where we want it, and that means becoming embroiled in what we don’t want. Returning to the centre, to our starting point, regularly keeps us in mind of what we are working for. Whilst we may not feel that we are making much progress or perhaps we find it difficult to recognize that we are in fact moving forward, keeping focused on our own everyday world, and bringing the qualities we desire for the world, eg peace, into it is in fact the only thing we can do. We may strive to make other people aware of our cause or point of view, but until they are ready to listen, they will not respond. As we hold peace, or love, or joy in our own hearts and in our own lives, then that radiates out from us to touch those nearest to us and we impact people through our own integrity and example. Of course, we want everyone to wake up to the effect their actions have on others and to take responsibility for themselves, and in time they will.’
Me: ‘Again, I think you’re right, and I really appreciate having this articulated – something to refer to and be mindful of.’
Whilst I haven’t stopped seeing my work as focusing on challenging militarism (particularly as it especially affects young people), those two emails from Ruby did have a significant impact on me. I think I now better recognise how interconnected my work is with so many other good campaigns – getting rid of the military alone won’t bring about true peace: there won’t be peace for all because there won’t be abundance for all, and for many other reasons. And I do like the idea that the huge universe is the wholeness that we should try to connect with – I went to a sound bath (where you lie with your eyes closed whilst someone moves around playing a variety of instruments, including a large gong) with my oldest sister in Bath a month ago, and the intention I brought with me and tried to hold onto during the powerful experience of those reverberations was to see my peace work as part of a much bigger whole, that needs us to try and love others, including those we seem to be up against.